Skip to Content

Felipe v Farida [2015] DIFC SCT 058

Felipe v Farida [2015] DIFC SCT 058

July 1, 2015

image_pdfimage_print

Claim No: XXXX

 

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

 

In the name of His Highness Sheikh Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of Dubai 

 

IN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL OF DIFC COURTS

BEFORE H.E. JUSTICE SHAMLAN AL SAWALEHI

 

BETWEEN 

 

FELIPE 

Claimant

 

and

 

FARIDA

 

Defendant

 Hearing:            9 June 2015

Judgment:        22 June 2015


 JUDGMENT OF H.E. JUSTICE SHAMLAN AL SAWALEHI


UPON hearing the Claimant and the Defendant

AND UPON reading the submissions and evidence filed and recorded on the Court file

PURSUANT TO Rule 36.40 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts, paragraph 1, 15,16,18,20 and 22 of this order is amended.

Note: The previous incorrect numbers in the order and judgment are in strikethrough, and the amended, correct numbers are underlined for ease of reference.

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the sum of AED 7,692

2. The Defendant shall pay the Courts fee

The reasons: 

3. The Claimant alleged that he had been employed by the Defendant from 15 January 2014 until 2 April 2015 when his employment contract expired.

4. The Claimant requested to be paid all the benefits due at the end of his employment contract. The Defendant had refused to pay the Claimant, which had led the Claimant to file this case before the Court.

5. No settlement was reached by the parties at the end of the consultation and, consequently, the case was sent for adjudication. On 9 June 2015 I heard both parties’ submissions.

6. In the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim, the Claimant claimed for unpaid leave, gratuity, and one month’s notice. He argued that he had not received his dues at the end of his employment contract within 14 days, as the Defendant had reduced his salary without approval from March 2014 to March 2015.

7. In his defence, the Defendant had admitted that the Claimant was entitled to end of service benefits as calculated on the final settlement dated 10 June 2015 , but argued that the Claimant agreed to a new amount for his salary from March 2014 onwards as an alternative option to terminating his contract due to employee poor performance.

8. I hold that, the conduct of the employee by accepting to continue to work for his employer with the new amount of salary since March 2014 until his contract expired was an agreement to the new salary terms of the employment contract. In my view the employee could have refused to receive or accept a different amount of salary, and he could have filed an unauthorized deduction Claim against his employer from the first time he noticed that his salary was reduced without his approval.

9. I have also found that, the Claimant had worked since 15 January 2014 until 2 April 2015, that means that the Claimant has worked for (14) months and (18) days a total of (420days) on the rate of (24.16) calculated as (420 * 21 / 365), and the Claimant’s daily wage calculated as (AED 3,300 * 12 = 39,600. / 365), is the sum of AED 108.49 per day, and the Claimant’s Daily basic wage calculated as (AED 2,310 * 12 = 27,720. / 365), is the sum of AED 75.94 per day.

Compensation

10. Therefore, the Claimant is entitled to compensation for end of service gratuity payment, calculated for (21) days per year on a proportionate basis (75.94 * 24.16), in the sum of AED 1834 , in accordance with Article 62 (2) (a) and (3) of the DIFC Employment Law .

11. Then I have found that, the Claimant is entitled to compensation in lieu of termination notice, calculated for (30) days for continuous working more than 3 months ( 108.49 * 30 ) , in the sum of AED 3,255 , in accordance with Article 59 (2) (b) of the DIFC Employment Law.

12. Furthermore, the Claimant is entitled to compensation in lieu of vacation leave for (30) days in accordance with the Claimant’s employment agreement point 3, calculated on a pro rata basis (108.49 * 22) in the sum of AED 2386, in accordance with Article 27 (1) of the DIFC Employment Law , and in accordance withthe final settlement dated 10 June 2015.

13. As to the Claimant’s claim for unpaid salary, I am of the view that the Claimant is entitled to payment in lieu for (2) unpaid days only, in the sum of AED 217, in accordance withthe final settlement dated 10 June 2015.

14. For those reasons, the Claimant’s total compensation is the sum of AED 7,692, for unpaid salary, gratuity payment, vacation leave and termination notice in respect of his Employment Contract.

15.Accordingly, I dismiss any other claim advanced by the Claimant.

 

Issued by:

Maha AlMehairi

Judicial Officer

Date of issue: 22 June 2015

Date of re-Issue: 1 July 2015

At: 3pm

X

Privacy Policy

The Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DIFC Courts's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DIFC Courts in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DIFC Courts is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DIFC Courts’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.
X

Disclaimer

The content of the DIFC Courts website is provided for information purposes only and should be disregarded when making decisions on inheritance and any other matters. Whilst every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, the DIFC Courts makes no warranties or representations to you as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the content on this website, which is subject to change at any time without notice. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice by the DIFC Courts or any person employed or connected with it or formerly so employed or connected, to any person on any matter, be it in relation to inheritance, succession planning or otherwise. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer in relation to your personal circumstances and your objectives. The DIFC Courts does not assume any liability and shall not be liable to you for any damages, including but not limited to, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with this website, its administration and any content or lack thereof found on it. The information on this web site is not to be displayed except in full screen format. Although care has been taken to provide links to suitable material from this site, no guarantee can be given about the suitability, completeness or accuracy of any of the material that this site may be linked to or other material on the internet. The DIFC Courts cannot accept any responsibility for the content of material that may be encountered therein.