Skip to Content

CFI 006/2018 Mayer Brown LLP (DIFC Branch) v Bin Butti International Holdings LLC

CFI 006/2018 Mayer Brown LLP (DIFC Branch) v Bin Butti International Holdings LLC

April 25, 2018

image_pdfimage_print

Claim No. CFI-006-2018

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

MAYER BROWN LLP (DIFC BRANCH)

Claimant

and

BIN BUTTI INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC

Defendant


DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF JUDICIAL OFFICER NASSIR AL NASSER


UPON the request made by the Claimant on 11 April 2018 for a Default Judgment (the “Request”) in accordance with Rule 13.1 (1) and (2) of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (“RDC”), it is found as follows:

1.The Request is not one prohibited by RDC 13.3 (1) or (2).

2. The Defendant has failed to file an Acknowledgment of Service or a Defence to the claim (or any part of the claim) with the DIFC Courts and the relevant time for so doing has expired (RDC 13.4).

3. The Defendant has not: (i) applied to the DIFC Courts to have the Claimant’s statement of case struck out under RDC 4.16; or for immediate judgment under RDC Part 24 (RDC 13.6(1)); (ii) satisfied the whole claim (including any claim for costs) on which the Claimant is seeking judgment; or (iii) filed or served on the Claimant an admission under RDC 15.14 or 15.24 together with a request for time to pay (RDC 13.6(3)).

4. The Claimant filed a Certificate of Service in accordance with RDC 9.43 on 25 February 2018.

5. The Claimant has followed the required procedure for obtaining Default Judgment RDC 13.7 and 13.8.

6. The claim is for a specified sum of money and the Request specifies the date by which the whole of the judgment debt is to be paid or the times and rate at which it is to be paid by instalments (RDC 13.9).

7. The Claimant has submitted evidence, as required by RDC 13.24, that (i) the claim is one that the DIFC Courts have power to hear and decide and (ii) no other court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide the claim.

8. The DIFC Courts are not satisfied that the conditions of RDC 136.22 and RDC 13.23 have been met.

ACCORDINGLY IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

9. The Request is dismissed.

10. The Claimant shall serve the claim form on the Defendant in accordance with the law of the place which it is to be served.

11. The Claimant shall bear the costs of this application.

 

Issued by:

Ayesha Bin Kalban

Assistant Registrar

Date of Issue: 25 April 2018

At: 2pm

X

Privacy Policy

The Dispute Resolution Authority and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dispute Resolution Authority and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DRA's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DRA in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DRA and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DRA is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DRA and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DRA and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DRA and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DRA’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.