Skip to Content

CFI 044/2018 Grand Valley General Trading LLC vs GGICO Sunteck Limited

CFI 044/2018 Grand Valley General Trading LLC vs GGICO Sunteck Limited

September 16, 2018

image_pdfimage_print

Claim No. CFI-044 -2018

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

GRAND VALLEY GENERAL TRADING LLC

Claimant

and

GGICO SUNTECK LIMITED

Defendant


ORDER OF JUDICIAL OFFICER MAHA AL MEHAIRI


UPON reviewing the Request of the Claimant dated 13 August 2018 for Default Judgment in accordance with Rule 13.1 (1) and (2) of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (“RDC”), it is found as follows:

1. The Claimant’s request is not one prohibited by RDC 13.3 (1) or (2).

2. The Claimant has filed a Certificate of Service in accordance with RDC 9.43 on 15 July 2018.

3. The First Defendant has failed to file an Acknowledgment of Service or a Defence to the claim (or any part of the claim) with the DIFC Courts and the relevant time for so doing has expired (RDC 13.4).

4. The First Defendant has not: (i) applied to the Court either to have the Claimant’s statement of case struck out under RDC 4.16 or for immediate judgment under RDC Part 24 (RDC 13.6(1)); (ii) satisfied the whole claim (including any claim for costs) on which the Claimant is seeking judgment (RDC 13.6(2) / RDC 13.22(3)); or (iii) filed or served on the Claimant an admission under RDC 15.14 or 15.24 together with a request for time to pay (RDC 13.6(3) / RDC 13.22).

5. The Claimant has followed the required procedure for obtaining Default Judgment (RDC 13.7 and 13.8).

6. The Request includes a request for interest pursuant to RDC 13.15.

ACCORDINGLY IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

7. The request is granted.

8. The First Defendant shall be dissolved in accordance with Article 295(6) and/or Article 298 of the UAE Federal Law No. 2 of 2015 concerning Commercial Companies.

9. The Claimant shall be entitled to interest, in accordance with Article 76 of UAE Federal Law No.18 of 1993 on the Commercial Transactions Law, on monies it contributed to the First Defendant, to be assessed and paid during the course of the First Defendant’s dissolution.

10. The First Defendant shall pay the Claimant the legal costs of this claim, to be assessed by the Registrar, if not agreed.

11. The Claimant shall serve this Judgment upon the First Defendant.

 

Issued by:

Ayesha Bin Kalban

Assistant Registrar

Date: 16 September 2018

At: 4pm

X

Privacy Policy

The Dispute Resolution Authority and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dispute Resolution Authority and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DRA's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DRA in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DRA and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DRA is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DRA and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DRA and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DRA and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DRA’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.