Skip to Content

CFI 008/2007 – Ruling

CFI 008/2007 – Ruling

January 20, 2009


Case No. CFI 008/2007





and8 INVESTMENT INC 1st Defendant
and8 INVESTMENT GROUP FZE 2nd Defendant



I do feel very strongly that the amount of time which the Court ought to apply for the purposes of encouraging settlement has really got to have some sort of limits attached to it and those limits have clearly got to be fashioned with regard to the availability of Judge time and Court facilities.

At the moment I am not persuaded that it will be appropriate to apply the Court facilities of video conferencing set up for a hearing which may last more than half a day or certainly 3½ hours or something of that sort where the parties, as it seems to me, can if they really put their minds to it, get to the point over the next two days where they must be able to know whether there is a very strong chance of settlement and that it is highly probable that a hearing wont be necessary or that any further hearings will definitely not be necessary.

My approach is that the Court facilities for an adjourned hearing are available from not before noon on Thursday and they have to be used if the parties want to deploy those facilities for the purpose of handling any further matters that have to be resolved.

Accordingly, the Order which I now make is that these applications will be adjourned until not before 12 noon on Thursday when the parties must be prepared to have those matters argued out. I say nothing about determined because that matter, the question of determination, can be adjourned to enable the parties to have a better chance of settling the case if they have not already done so. The matter must be argued out, as I see it, when the Court facilities are available. They are available from about 12 noon on Thursday and that’s when there will be a hearing for that purpose. If the parties don’t use them at that time, and the case has not settled, or is not highly probable to settle, then serious consideration will have to be given as to whether all the applications that are outstanding should be struck out under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court. That’s all. Not before 12 noon on Thursday.


Justice Sir Anthony Colman
Date of issue: 20 January 2009
At 2pm



Privacy Policy

The Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DIFC Courts's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DIFC Courts in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DIFC Courts is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DIFC Courts’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.


The content of the DIFC Courts website is provided for information purposes only and should be disregarded when making decisions on inheritance and any other matters. Whilst every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, the DIFC Courts makes no warranties or representations to you as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the content on this website, which is subject to change at any time without notice. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice by the DIFC Courts or any person employed or connected with it or formerly so employed or connected, to any person on any matter, be it in relation to inheritance, succession planning or otherwise. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer in relation to your personal circumstances and your objectives. The DIFC Courts does not assume any liability and shall not be liable to you for any damages, including but not limited to, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with this website, its administration and any content or lack thereof found on it. The information on this web site is not to be displayed except in full screen format. Although care has been taken to provide links to suitable material from this site, no guarantee can be given about the suitability, completeness or accuracy of any of the material that this site may be linked to or other material on the internet. The DIFC Courts cannot accept any responsibility for the content of material that may be encountered therein.