Skip to Content

CFI 014/2010 – Order

CFI 014/2010 – Order

March 17, 2013


Claim No: CFI 014/2010










TAALEEM P.J.S.C. Claimant



UPON THE APPLICATION of the Claimant, Taleem PJSC, by Application Notice dated 1 November 2012 (No CFI 014/2010/18) for the production of documents by the Second Defendant, Deyaar Development PJSC


AND UPON THE APPLICATION of the First Defendant, National Bonds Corporation PJSC, by Application Notice also dated 1 November October 2012 (No CFI 014/2010/19) for the production of documents by the Second Defendant


AND UPON HEARING leading counsel for the Second Defendant and counsel for the Claimant and for First Defendant


AND UPON the Second Defendant by counsel stating that it would confirm in writing the matters set out in the Schedule hereto


THE COURT MAKES NO ORDER on the application save that:


1. The Second Defendant shall within seven days of the date of this Order (in so far as it has not already done so) produce to the Claimant and to the First Defendant:


(a) Correspondence between the Second Defendant and the Ruler’s Court relating to the payment of AED 9,501,902 in May 2009;


(b) Any complaint made by the Second Defendant to Financial Audit Department (“the FAD”) in relation to the FAD’s investigation into the Sky Gardens transaction.

Provided that, in respect of the documents to be disclosed pursuant to sub-paragraph (a):


(i) the Second Defendant shall be at liberty to inform the Ruler’s Court of the order that is being made in relation to those documents;


(ii) the documents are not to be disseminated without a further order of this Court or the consent of the Ruler’s Court;


(iii) before reading or referring to those documents at a hearing the party proposing to do so should invite the Court to consider whether an order should be made under RDC 28.57 or that that part of the hearing should be held in private.


2. The Second Defendant shall within seven days of the date of this Order (in so far as it has not already done so) produce to the Claimant the documents described in Classes 1 and 3 in paragraph 2(2) of the Claimant’s Request.


3. The Second Defendant shall within seven days of the date of this Order (in so far as it has not already done so) take the steps necessary to recreate the electronic back-up files and restore the e-mail account of Abdulla Al Hamli for the period 1 September 2008 to 31 May 2010 and, the back-up electronic files having been re-created and the e-mail account restored, shall conduct the following keyword searches in respect of the restored e-mail account: (a) “Sky Garden”, (b)”NBC” and “National Bonds”, (c) “Taaleem”, (d) “FAD”, (e) “Ruler’s court”, (f) “Amlak”, “Amlak Sky Gardens” and “ASG”, (g)”Nasser” and “Nasser Al Shaikh”, (h) “Buti”, “Buti Jumairi and “Buti Jumeiri”, (i)”Mazaya” and (j) “First Dubai”. For the avoidance of doubt, each of the keyword searches shall be performed individually and duplicate copies of e-mails produced as a result of the various searches shall be removed by a process of de-duplication.


4. The Second Defendant shall search the de-duplicated e-mails generated by the keyword searches in paragraph 3 of this Order for documents falling within the First Defendant’s Requests and shall within fourteen days of the date of this Order (in so far as it has not already done so) disclose any documents found as a result of that search which have not already been produced in these proceedings.


5. The Second Defendant shall provide a Document Production Statement in accordance with RDC 28.2228.24 which shall verify compliance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of this Order.


6. As between the Claimant and the Second Defendant the costs of the Claimant’s application for the production of documents shall be costs in the case.


7. As between the First Defendant and the Second Defendant the costs of the First Defendant’s application for the production of documents shall be costs in the case.


8. A party seeking to rely on provisions of UAE Law shall set out and deliver to the other parties, first, a statement of the issues in relation to which it contends provisions of UAE Law are relevant; and, second, what the applicable provisions of UAE Law are said to be in relation to those issues. Any application to adduce expert evidence as to UAE Law is adjourned for further consideration.


9. The parties shall inform the Registry of periods after the middle of September during which their counsel are not available for a trial or which they wish to avoid.


10. Liberty to apply.

Issued by:
Mark Beer
Date of Issue: 17 March 2013
At: 10am


Privacy Policy

The Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DIFC Courts's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DIFC Courts in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DIFC Courts is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DIFC Courts’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.


The content of the DIFC Courts website is provided for information purposes only and should be disregarded when making decisions on inheritance and any other matters. Whilst every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, the DIFC Courts makes no warranties or representations to you as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the content on this website, which is subject to change at any time without notice. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice by the DIFC Courts or any person employed or connected with it or formerly so employed or connected, to any person on any matter, be it in relation to inheritance, succession planning or otherwise. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer in relation to your personal circumstances and your objectives. The DIFC Courts does not assume any liability and shall not be liable to you for any damages, including but not limited to, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with this website, its administration and any content or lack thereof found on it. The information on this web site is not to be displayed except in full screen format. Although care has been taken to provide links to suitable material from this site, no guarantee can be given about the suitability, completeness or accuracy of any of the material that this site may be linked to or other material on the internet. The DIFC Courts cannot accept any responsibility for the content of material that may be encountered therein.