Claim No. CFI 033/2009, CFI 013/2010 & CA 004 /2011
THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS
IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
IN THE MATTER OF ORION HOLDINGS OVERSEAS LIMITED (in liquidation)
|SHAHAB HAIDER(Liquidator of Orion Holdings Overseas Limited)||Respondent|
ERNST & YOUNG MIDDLE EAST
ORDER OF H.E JUSTICE OMAR ALMUHAIRI MADE ON 16 APRIL 2013
UPON reviewing Application Notices CA 004/2011/08, CA 004/2011/09 & CA 004/2011/10 filed on behalf of Ernst & Young (“Applicant”) on 2 April 2013
AND UPON considering the Reply submissions filed on behalf of the Liquidator of Orion Holdings Overseas Ltd — Shahab Haider (“Respondent”), dated 9 April 2013
AND UPON considering the Reply to Response submissions on behalf of Ernst & Young on 11 April 2013
AND UPON reviewing the relevant documents in the case file
I HEREBY FIND THAT
On 7 February 2013 the Respondent served P40/01 Notice of Commencement of Assessment of Bills of Costs (in relation to CFI 013/2010, CFI 033/2009 & CA 004/2011) on the Applicant. On 24 February 2013 the Applicant filed three Application Notices (CA 004/2011/04, CA 004/2011/05 & CFI 033/2009/04) requesting an extension to 31 March 2013 to file their Points of Dispute to the Respondent’s Bills of Costs, the extension was agreed between the parties and the Court subsequently issued the Order of 28 February 2013 granting the Applicant’s extension request. However, the Applicant failed to file its respective Points of Dispute by 12pm on 31 March 2013. On 1 April 2013 the Respondent filed three P40/02 Requests for Default Cost Certificates (CFI 033/2009/05, CA 004/2011/06 & CA 004/2011/07). On 1 April 2013 the Registry issued the Default Cost Certificates. On 2 April 2013 (three days after the agreed extension provided in the Court’s Order of 28 February 2013) the Applicant filed three Application Notices (CA 004/2011/08, CA 004/2011/09 &CA 004/2011/10) which contained the Applicant’s respective Points of dispute to the Respondent’s Bills of Costs along with requests to set aside the three Default Cost Certificates issued on 1 April 2013. On 2 April 2013 the Registry issued directions expediting the Response and Reply to Response submissions to the Application Notices CA 004/2011/08, CA 004/2011/09 & CA 004/2011/10. On 9 April 2013 the Respondent filed their Response and on 11 April 2013 the Applicant filed their Reply to Response.
Pursuant to Rule 40.24 of the DIFC Courts, the Court may set aside or vary a Default Costs Certificate if it appears to the Court that there is some good reason why the Detailed Assessment proceedings should continue. Before me there is no good reason identified. As such and for the above reasons
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
Issued On: 17 April 2013
Time: 5 pm
The Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.
Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.
The content of the DIFC Courts website is provided for information purposes only and should be disregarded when making decisions on inheritance and any other matters. Whilst every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, the DIFC Courts makes no warranties or representations to you as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the content on this website, which is subject to change at any time without notice. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice by the DIFC Courts or any person employed or connected with it or formerly so employed or connected, to any person on any matter, be it in relation to inheritance, succession planning or otherwise. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer in relation to your personal circumstances and your objectives. The DIFC Courts does not assume any liability and shall not be liable to you for any damages, including but not limited to, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with this website, its administration and any content or lack thereof found on it. The information on this web site is not to be displayed except in full screen format. Although care has been taken to provide links to suitable material from this site, no guarantee can be given about the suitability, completeness or accuracy of any of the material that this site may be linked to or other material on the internet. The DIFC Courts cannot accept any responsibility for the content of material that may be encountered therein.