Skip to Content

CFI 027/2013 BGC Brokers L.P. v Mourad Abourahim

CFI 027/2013 BGC Brokers L.P. v Mourad Abourahim

August 6, 2015

image_pdfimage_print

Claim No. CFI 027/2013

 

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

 

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

 

BETWEEN

 

BGC BROKERS L.P.

Claimant

 

and

 

MOURAD ABOURAHIM

Defendant


 ORDER WITH REASONS OF JUSTICE SIR RICHARD FIELD 


UPON the Judgment of Sir Richard Field dated 31 May 2015 ordering the Claimant and the Defendant to file submissions on the issue relating to the currency of the Claim;

AND UPON the Claimant filing their submissions on 14 June 2015;

AND UPON the Defendant making no submissions;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

  1. The applicable conversion date in this case shall be the date the Claim Form was issued.
  2. The Claimant shall serve a re-calculation of the sum sued for, including interest, taking the date of the Claim Form as the applicable conversion date. 

REASONS

  1. The time by which the Defendant was directed to serve submissions in reply to the Claimant’s submissions on the currency issue ordered to be addressed in the Judgment herein is now well past. I therefore now give my ruling on this issue.
  2. The Claimant’s claim for sums due under the loan agreement was expressed in US dollars, notwithstanding that the currency of the loan was pounds sterling. This may have been because the prescribed pro forma Claim Form contemplates the claim being made in US dollars.
  3. The conversion date adopted by the Claimant was the date the loan was advanced. In my view, this is the wrong date to take for conversion purposes, since down to at least the issuance of the Claim Form, the obligation arising under the loan agreement was an obligation denominated in sterling. In these circumstances, I think there are two potential conversion dates: the date of the issue of the Claim Form or the date of enforcement of a judgment given in sterling. The latter date would I think be the most appropriate, but RDC 36.14 only allows for conversion at the date of enforcement if judgment has been given in a currency other than US dollars, which was not something that was sought in this case and it is now too late to amend the claim.
  4. In the result, I find that the applicable conversion date in this case should be the date the Claim Form was issued and I invite the Claimant to serve a re-calculation of the sum sued for, including interest, taking the date of the Claim Form as the applicable conversion date.

Issued by:

Mark Beer

Registrar

Date: 6 August 2015

At: 4pm

X

Privacy Policy

The Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DIFC Courts's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DIFC Courts in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DIFC Courts is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DIFC Courts’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.
X

Disclaimer

The content of the DIFC Courts website is provided for information purposes only and should be disregarded when making decisions on inheritance and any other matters. Whilst every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, the DIFC Courts makes no warranties or representations to you as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the content on this website, which is subject to change at any time without notice. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice by the DIFC Courts or any person employed or connected with it or formerly so employed or connected, to any person on any matter, be it in relation to inheritance, succession planning or otherwise. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer in relation to your personal circumstances and your objectives. The DIFC Courts does not assume any liability and shall not be liable to you for any damages, including but not limited to, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with this website, its administration and any content or lack thereof found on it. The information on this web site is not to be displayed except in full screen format. Although care has been taken to provide links to suitable material from this site, no guarantee can be given about the suitability, completeness or accuracy of any of the material that this site may be linked to or other material on the internet. The DIFC Courts cannot accept any responsibility for the content of material that may be encountered therein.