Skip to Content

CFI 047/2017 Commercial Bank of Dubai Psc v M/S Totora Restaurant and Lounge LLC & Others

CFI 047/2017 Commercial Bank of Dubai Psc v M/S Totora Restaurant and Lounge LLC & Others

March 11, 2018

image_pdfimage_print

Claim No: CFI-047-2017

 

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

 

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI PSC

Claimant

and

(1) M/S TOTORA RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE LLC 

(2) ALI ABDULLAH AL SIDANI

(3) SHAIKHA RANEYA HAMAD MUBARAK HAMAD AL KHALIFA

(4) AHMAD MOHAMED RAMADHAN AL RAFEI

Defendants


  ORDER WITH REASONS OF H.E. JUSTICE ALI AL MADHANI


UPON reviewing the Third Defendant’s Application No. CFI-047-2017/4 dated 4 February 2018  (the “Application”) seeking an order that the witness statement of Rebecca Copley, Counsel on record for Claimant, dated 21 January 2018 and filed as part of Claimant’s evidence in answer to the Third Defendant’s application contesting jurisdiction dated 7 December 2017 (the “Jurisdictional Application”), be struck out from the record under the Court’s discretion as per Rules of the DIFC Courts (the “RDC”)  29.15 or RDC 29.10, or in the alternative that its evidentiary weight be discounted for lack of first-hand knowledge; that as per RDC 4.2(14) the timetable for giving evidence in reply with respect to the Jurisdictional Application be stayed pending resolution of this Application; and that the Claimant bear the costs of this application

AND UPON reviewing the Claimant’s response to the Application

AND PURSUANT TO RDC 29.9, 29.10, 29.15 and 29.18

AND PURSUANT TO paragraph 2.1 of Practice Direction No. 1 of 2016, I find that paragraphs 11,15, 24 and 25 of the witness statement of Rebecca Copley, Counsel on record for Claimant, is characterized by legal arguments and by controversial factual statements that are unsupported by documentary evidence, about which Ms. Copley does not have first-hand knowledge

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The Application is granted.

2. The Claimant is ordered to amend its evidence by removing the controversial statements and unsupported facts in the said paragraphs or elsewhere in its evidence within 7 days from the date of this Order.

3. The Claimant shall pay the Defendant’s costs of the Application, to be assessed by the Registrar if not agreed.

 

Issued by:

Ayesha Bin Kalban

Assistant Registrar

Date of issue: 11 March 2018

At: 1pm

 

X

Privacy Policy

The Dispute Resolution Authority and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dispute Resolution Authority and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DRA's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DRA in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DRA and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DRA is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DRA and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DRA and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DRA and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DRA’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.