Skip to Content

CFI 029/2018 The Industrial Group Ltd v Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid

CFI 029/2018 The Industrial Group Ltd v Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid

January 16, 2019


Claim No. CFI-029-2018











UPON reviewing Appeal Notice dated 6 November 2018 (“The Application”) seeking permission to appeal the decision dismissing the Defendant’s Application to set aside the Default Judgment of Judicial Officer Nassir Al Nasser dated 30 July 2018

AND UPON reviewing Appellant’s evidence in support to the Application dated 6 November 2018

AND UPON reviewing Appellant’s Skeleton Arguments dated 27 November 2018


The Application for permission to appeal is denied.

Issued by:

Ayesha Bin Kalban

Assistant Registrar

Date of issue: 16 January 2019

Time: 9am



1.The Defendant seeks permission to appeal the order dismissing his application to have set aside the judgment in default of defence entered against him by Judicial Officer Nassir Al Nasser.

2. The Defendant’s grounds of appeal are to be derived (with some difficulty) from his Notice of Appeal and with less difficulty from the skeleton argument produced by his counsel.

3. No skeleton argument in opposition has been filed by the Claimant/Respondent within the time period set by RDC 44.14.

4. In my judgment, none of the arguments raised in the Notice of Appeal or the skeleton argument has a real prospect of success as required by RDC 44. There is no doubt at all that in reality the Claimant/Respondent relied on the failure of the Defendant to serve a Defence as the ground for seeking judgment in default. The fact that Defendant may have confusingly stated that the Defendant had also failed to serve an Acknowledgement of Service in the Request for Default Judgment therefore in no way misled the Judicial Officer or the CFI since judgment in default of a defence can only be obtained if the defendant has served an Acknowledgment of Service but not a Defence, see RDC 13.5(1).

5. Further, any challenge to the CFI’s conclusion that no part of the Defendant’s counterclaim constituted a set-off against the claim for which judgment in default had been given has no real prospect of success, so that any argument based on an assertion that the quantum of the counterclaim overtopped the judgment sum also has no real prospect of success.


Privacy Policy

The Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates are committed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of client data and personal information.

Dubai International Financial Centre and all its affiliates employees, vendors, contract workers, shall follow Information Security Management System in all the processes and technology.

  1. DIFC Courts's Top Management is committed to secure information of all our interested parties.
  2. Information security controls the policies, processes, and measures that are implemented by DIFC Courts in order to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, and to maximize opportunities in order to achieve its information security objectives.
  3. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall adopt a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk treatment.
  4. DIFC Courts is committed to provide information security awareness among team members and evaluate the competency of all its employees.
  5. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall protect personal information held by them in all its form.
  6. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall comply with all regulatory, legal and contractual requirements.
  7. DIFC Courts and all its affiliates shall provide a comprehensive Business Continuity Plan encompassing the locations within the scope of the ISMS.
  8. Information shall be made available to authorised persons as and when required.
  9. DIFC Courts’s Top Management is committed towards continual improvement in information security in all our processes through regular review of our information security management system.


The content of the DIFC Courts website is provided for information purposes only and should be disregarded when making decisions on inheritance and any other matters. Whilst every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, the DIFC Courts makes no warranties or representations to you as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the content on this website, which is subject to change at any time without notice. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice by the DIFC Courts or any person employed or connected with it or formerly so employed or connected, to any person on any matter, be it in relation to inheritance, succession planning or otherwise. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer in relation to your personal circumstances and your objectives. The DIFC Courts does not assume any liability and shall not be liable to you for any damages, including but not limited to, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with this website, its administration and any content or lack thereof found on it. The information on this web site is not to be displayed except in full screen format. Although care has been taken to provide links to suitable material from this site, no guarantee can be given about the suitability, completeness or accuracy of any of the material that this site may be linked to or other material on the internet. The DIFC Courts cannot accept any responsibility for the content of material that may be encountered therein.